Being mostly independent school librarians in Manhattan, it’s no surprise that some of us were suffering from, or recovering from, the cold that everyone in the NY metro area seems to have. Luckily, Karyn and I were prepared with Cold 911 from David’s Tea (our not-so-secret obsession), and we served up a few pots before getting down to our discussion.
All of our titles were written on a white board in alphabetical order by author’s last name. To save our limited time for in-depth discussion, we did a quick poll (by show of hands) of everyone’s top-five books. The Drowned Cities and Aristotle and Dante Discover the Secrets of the Universe received the lowest number of votes, which matched the results of our original nominations poll.
We decided to discuss the books in the order they appeared on the board, putting The Diviners by Libba Bray up first. This was also our first opportunity to review the Printz policies and procedures, which Karyn helpfully wrote on the white board for easy review. Whether The Diviners succeeds as a standalone book was a main topic of our discussion, as was Evie’s emotional journey, and the character development overall.
The Fault in Our Stars came next. John Green’s novel had received the
64% of the votes in the nominations round, and while there was a lot of love for
John Green, we had to wonder if he was bigger than the work itself. Ultimately,
we agreed that although voice and style were strong, the plot and some of the
characters were flawed.
Before discussion started we acknowledged that none of us had read every title, but that we would do our best to give informed opinions when possible and lean on those who had read a particular title. One of these was Margo Lanagan's The Brides of Rollrock Island, which had our members questioning if it is actually a YA title. Karyn informed us that on a real Printz committee, the chair and members would agree prior to discussion if a book published as YA (but judged by committee as not really a YA book) would meet criteria. This was an important designation to note, as the Printz criteria certainly covers the publishing distinction, but not the critical.
Plot, theme, and
characters dominated the discussion of David Levithan’s Every Day. Some members took issue with the pat moral lessons, and
the implication that A could understand the life of a person after living in
their body for just one day. However, we agreed that the Levithan challenges readers to face their own biases.
Railsea by China Mieville was
another title that was sadly under-read by our group, but Karyn made a good
case for its world-building and wit. Collectively, we marveled at Karyn’s copy
heavily laden with post-it flags.
We returned to our
series vs. standalone debate with The
Raven Boys. It seemed like we all heart this book and Maggie Stiefvater, but there was some
disagreement on the richness of the characters and themes. Some felt that
although parts of these elements are established in this book, it’s too evident
that more is to come in future books.
Finally, we discussed
our second place title in the nominations round: Code Name Verity. Although it didn’t touch everyone emotionally
(i.e.: not all of us cried), we agreed that superior craft is on display in
Elizabeth Wein’s book.
When it came time to
vote, there was definitely excitement in the air. Having been snacking on
candy, pretzels, and tea, we were fueled up and ready to back our favorites. In
secret ballots, we each ranked three books for Mock Printz gold. Each first
place vote was worth 5 points, second place 3 points, and third place votes
were worth 1 point. (In the excitement of the afternoon, we accidentally gave TFIOS one extra second place vote that
was meant for CNV, but the difference
is negligible). Here’s a look at how the votes fell:
Click to enlarge the table. |
This first round is so interesting because CNV narrowly edges out ATP, but ATP placed on every member’s list save one. To win, a book needs to receive 50% + 1 first place vote, which means that we needed to vote again to get our true fake winner.
Second round voting in the Real Printz should follow another round of discussion, often focusing on the books that dominated the top votes, but in the interest of time and excitement, we went straight to the voting. Karyn advised us to vote strategically in order to reach a decisive winner; therefore, a member could sway the vote to CNV or ATP by changing their first place vote. With that in mind, here’s the second round breakdown:
Click to enlarge the table. |
Once again, running on
adrenaline we miscounted at the time so the breakdowns shown here are the result of
a second count. Although it didn’t win
by the true Printz margin, our Mock Printz gold went to Ask the Passengers, proving that consensus is just as important as
perfection when it comes to the Printz.
As in the Real Printz, we voted for Honor books separately. This was also an aha! moment for
many of us, as it became clear that although one might not vote for a certain
title for Gold, you may want to support a flawed but noteworthy book for an
Honor. With this in mind, our Mock Honor picks were: Code Name Verity, The Fault in Our Stars, Railsea and The Brides of Rollrock Island.
After a long day’s
journey into night, we not only came away with Mock Printz winners, but picks
for our February Book Club. The titles, date and time for our first meeting of
2013 will be announced here on the blog soon!
Head over to Someday MyPrintz Will Come for additional analysis and data on our Mock Printz. Thank you
to all who participated! Watch this space for details on how to participate in next year's Mock Printz sequel: bigger, better, more tea.
Joy, thanks for this detailed and fascinating recap of your meeting! What an incredible process.
ReplyDeleteI was sorry to read that relatively few participants had read Brides of Rollrock Island, though not necessarily surprised (see below). I probably wouldn't have read it myself if not for Lanagan's earlier book, Tender Morsels, which blew me away.
The truth is that I was mortified to be caught on the subway reading a book with such a truly dreadful cover. But I did it anyway, and I'm glad. I found BRI to be a phenomenal read, weird and dark and bursting with folktale energy. I work with all boys, and I sure do wish I could get them to read it. As a springboard for conversation about gender, I think it could be incredible. But, alas, there's no way that cover will ever move off these shelves. Anyway, glad to see it made your honor list.
"I work with all boys, and I sure do wish I could get them to read it. As a springboard for conversation about gender, I think it could be incredible. But, alas, there's no way that cover will ever move off these shelves."
ReplyDeleteI think one of the remarks in favor of the book was that it is really thematically sophisticated, which launched us into our conversation about whether it is too adult. However, some also questioned if the ideas were not developed enough, but as you say, it seems like it could be a great conversation starter.
The cover didn't come up in conversation, but I agree, it's pretty bad. Aside from doing a poor job of visually representing the book, it seems to say very little about anything.
Great post, Joy. It is a pleasure to read the details of all the give and take in these discussions. Many thanks.
ReplyDelete